Yes, the zombies will not only eat but they'll also infect others turning a population into savage mindless corpse. Zombies will always be hungry but their hunger is never satisfy thus they stop at nothing.
This is such a mind boggling question. I mean, there are slow zombies and fast zombies (The only experience I have with zombies are in the original Resident Evil, which had both). Do you choose a weapon based on strength or ammo capacity? But at the cost of lugging around a heavy weapon? I'd give you more "likes" if I could.
What's a good weapon that doesn't involve reloading? I guess you can use a sword, but then a) you need to be trained if you're fighting off multiple zombies and b) you'd have to have the stamina to use it.
A shotgun would be effective at close range, but it's not efficient at all to reload, especially if you have a horde of zombies coming after you.
I've always wondered: what weapon would you choose in your fight against the zombies?
Something with ammo or something that runs on electricity? or something that doesn't use either?
Atleast with slow ones, we'd have the advantage of speed and we have a choice of shooting them or running away to get more ammo.
Best Weapon is one you dont need to reload.
And can't the shotgun double as a metal bar?
A shotgun would be effective at close range, but it's not efficient at all to reload, especially if you have a horde of zombies coming after you.
But what weapon with ammo that is fast at reloading? a glock? but glocks don't pack much power...
Good luck with trying to wield two swords while in armor. I doubt you'll last more than a couple of hours before you run out of strength.