Do you think women in SF are more attractive than those in LA?

Click to vote and we'll show you the results.

YES

This question was: Great Confusing Inappropriate

131 votes

Comments (11)

JMcGill

report spam

2 years ago

I'd imagine women in Los Angeles to be gorgeous with the most expensive clothes and plastic surgery that $$$ can buy. That comes at a high price though since she will want you to buy her expensive purses and eat at the fancy restaurants. And women in San Francisco probably all have underarm hair. I've been all around the world and frankly the most beautiful women live in Eastern Europe.

(1)

Frisbee

report spam

2 years ago

San Francisco's kind of a warm place, so not too hot, so I don't know how you get a chance to peek at their underarm hairs...

(4)

itouchmice

report spam

2 years ago

the women in LA are definitely gorgeous, but they're ALL THE SAME. they tend to fit a status quo set up by the latest fashion of Hollywood. SF has more variety in women that do whatever they want

(5)

Frisbee

report spam

2 years ago

I've never been to LA but I would imagine that LA is heavily influenced by Hollywood.

(0)

theallygshow

report spam

2 years ago

In LA you never know what is real and/or what's been added or altered. At least in SF most women try to go with the natural look.

(4)

Cerberus

report spam

2 years ago

In SF, the women are not held accountable for their looks, but they are good at heart.

(1)

Frisbee

report spam

2 years ago

That statement seems a little subjective...

I don't think "good at heart" is determined by location, though it might be determined by culture.

(0)

theuglystick

report spam

2 years ago

I'd take a girl who gets coffee in her PJs over a girl who has to put on makeup to look out the window anyday of the week. Minus the underarm hair, that is.

(9)